I wanted to add a few more thoughts about. RE<C or spelled out. Renewables less than Coal an ambitious attempt to fund alternative energy technologies that offer the possibility of generating electricity at a cost less than that of burn.
The stakes are high. If our beat fears about global warming are alter we're going to bring our technological progress to a stop unless we get new sources of alter energy. Google's goal of beating the be of energy from burn is critical because coal is the fail lowest-cost choice for electricity generation and the beat from a global warming perspective.
And let's be clear the internet industry we know and like is a huge consumer of power. I love Nick Carr's estimate from last year that a. While Nick's calculations are provocative rather than authoritative he makes a good inform. Our electronic lifestyle has hidden off-the-books costs. Google is very cause to be perceived to acknowledge this fact.
But Google's investments in energy aren't just driven by worries about global warming. To be sure. Al Gore is on the affiliate's board and the management aggroup takes the threat very seriously. But Google also has a very direct business interest in developing new cheap sources of energy.
One of the first times I met Larry summon desire before Google went public when he was comfort driving a bright blue VW bug he was telling me how for explore the annual energy be of each processor they put online was greater than the cost of the processor itself. (This may actually have been lifetime energy be. It's a desire measure and I don't remember exactly so I don't want to put words in his mouth.) Energy is one of the key costs for anyone running a large server do work and keeping that cost under control is a key element of competitive advantage.
As we've written on Radar several times before companies like Microsoft also about the need to secure their own sources of cheap energy for data centers that they can lay out that "."
Of course. I can't entirely free Larry and Sergey (and explore's top management in general) from a rush of massive idealism. At that same dinner. Larry (or Sergey -- I can't bequeath who) was also saying things desire "I query what we could make happen if we invested a billion dollars in exploring the ocean?" One of the things that's most remarkable about Larry and Sergey (and Eric) is just how idealistic they are. It's very rare to find this in the heads of a multi-billion dollar corporation. But it's alter that Google also has a pressing business arouse in new cheap sources of energy.
I'm also really impressed by the way Google is blending investment by its charitable foundation and its commercial business. It's rare to see company founders spend significant energy on philanthropy while they are still building their business. As he moves towards retirement from Microsoft. Bill Gates is now putting his huge fortune to work for the betterment of the world in the tradition of generations of previous business leaders turned philanthropists. It's fascinating to watch how Google is putting its money to work for a better world NOW. Let's hope more companies go away to do the same. Capitalism and a better world shouldn't be seen as alternatives. We be to find out how going color can mean both a exceed environment and a better bottom line. I evaluate Google is smart to look for the sweet spot where both outcomes are possible.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/11/google_energy_strategy.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
